<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Montreal Canadiens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com</link>
	<description>Discussion on everything Montreal Canadiens</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The value of Mark Streit  by Randall Wright by jersey devil</title>
		<link>http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/01/16/the-value-of-mark-streit-by-randall-wright/#comment-4263</link>
		<dc:creator>jersey devil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/01/16/the-value-of-mark-streit-by-randall-wright/#comment-4263</guid>
		<description>He has lost his job, poor devil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He has lost his job, poor devil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A post-mortem by Olivier</title>
		<link>http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/2009/04/24/a-post-mortem/#comment-2086</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=46#comment-2086</guid>
		<description>The problem with Melanson is that, beginning with Hackett, then Theodore, then Huet and also Halak (who have improved this year I think), well, the guy actually has a track record. Maybe Price was thrown to the wolves a bit quickly.

Hearing Bob answering concerns about Price being too young to be given the #1 spot with references to Price's status as a "thoroughbred" made me somewhat nervous. The kid is talented and is already a contributor (albeit an inconsistent one), but right now, other hoping he outperforms his contract value (2 mil. under the cap I believe?), there isn't much we can ask of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Melanson is that, beginning with Hackett, then Theodore, then Huet and also Halak (who have improved this year I think), well, the guy actually has a track record. Maybe Price was thrown to the wolves a bit quickly.</p>
<p>Hearing Bob answering concerns about Price being too young to be given the #1 spot with references to Price&#8217;s status as a &#8220;thoroughbred&#8221; made me somewhat nervous. The kid is talented and is already a contributor (albeit an inconsistent one), but right now, other hoping he outperforms his contract value (2 mil. under the cap I believe?), there isn&#8217;t much we can ask of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A post-mortem by wright</title>
		<link>http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/2009/04/24/a-post-mortem/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=46#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>Good points, Wendel. The ownership issue will impact on the Habs rebuilding. At this point owner Gillette, is talking about sellling only a minority stake in the Habs. It appears he may have a buyer for his interrest in his partial ownership of the Liverpool soccer team. If Gillette stays as owner of the Habs, then Gainey appears to continue on as gm.

As for Price, I think a critical evaluation of goaltender coach Roland Melanson is imperative. Price does not look at all like the same goalie as when he first came up with the Habs. His mechanics are now deeply flawed, often not square to the shooter, a inability to track the puck properly, and playing too deep in the crease, and dropping too early on shots. I seriously question whether Melanson is at the root of Price's problems.

This is the year that Gainey needs to make a significant trade to upgrade the roster. It would appear almost assuredly, that Komisarek will leave via free agency. His departure, despite his struggles will create a void on defense. The need to acquire some grit upfront, and land an impact player is becoming more necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Wendel. The ownership issue will impact on the Habs rebuilding. At this point owner Gillette, is talking about sellling only a minority stake in the Habs. It appears he may have a buyer for his interrest in his partial ownership of the Liverpool soccer team. If Gillette stays as owner of the Habs, then Gainey appears to continue on as gm.</p>
<p>As for Price, I think a critical evaluation of goaltender coach Roland Melanson is imperative. Price does not look at all like the same goalie as when he first came up with the Habs. His mechanics are now deeply flawed, often not square to the shooter, a inability to track the puck properly, and playing too deep in the crease, and dropping too early on shots. I seriously question whether Melanson is at the root of Price&#8217;s problems.</p>
<p>This is the year that Gainey needs to make a significant trade to upgrade the roster. It would appear almost assuredly, that Komisarek will leave via free agency. His departure, despite his struggles will create a void on defense. The need to acquire some grit upfront, and land an impact player is becoming more necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A post-mortem by Wendel</title>
		<link>http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/2009/04/24/a-post-mortem/#comment-2077</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=46#comment-2077</guid>
		<description>Good review of the Habs' season. I think the biggest question is whether Gainey stays. With so many free agents, this team will likely see a major overhaul, and if the organization isn't committed to Gainey for another 3-5 years, they may rather somebody else take the reigns. The question of Gainey may be difficult too considering the possible transition of upper management and a change of ownership. The question of Price is tricky too, the kid may have totally soured on playing in Montreal and he may not be able to regain his form there because he will play tentatively, afraid to make a mistake. I will be interested to see how they handle that situation in the off-season because they could surely use the "other" Carey Price, not the guy who showed up for the second half of the season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review of the Habs&#8217; season. I think the biggest question is whether Gainey stays. With so many free agents, this team will likely see a major overhaul, and if the organization isn&#8217;t committed to Gainey for another 3-5 years, they may rather somebody else take the reigns. The question of Gainey may be difficult too considering the possible transition of upper management and a change of ownership. The question of Price is tricky too, the kid may have totally soured on playing in Montreal and he may not be able to regain his form there because he will play tentatively, afraid to make a mistake. I will be interested to see how they handle that situation in the off-season because they could surely use the &#8220;other&#8221; Carey Price, not the guy who showed up for the second half of the season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Montreal vs Boston: An analysis by Wendel</title>
		<link>http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/2009/04/13/montreal-vs-boston-an-analysis/#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=45#comment-1749</guid>
		<description>I think the Bruins are going to play a very physical series against the Habs, and I think they are going to try and intimidate them. Habs don't have many guys who can stand up to most of the B's, so they better hope they have their special teams clicking to slow the B's down or else this one will be over very quick I expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Bruins are going to play a very physical series against the Habs, and I think they are going to try and intimidate them. Habs don&#8217;t have many guys who can stand up to most of the B&#8217;s, so they better hope they have their special teams clicking to slow the B&#8217;s down or else this one will be over very quick I expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Lecavalier mirage by Pilot9193</title>
		<link>http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/2009/04/05/the-lecavalier-mirage/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Pilot9193</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=44#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>Any GM that would give up that much for Lecavalier should be fired. 

Tampa is a mess financially and therefore is not dealing from a position of strength.

As the salary cap shrinks and the NHL approaches financial Armaggeddon, Tampa will have less money to fill their roster. Hell they can't meet payroll without the NHL's small market subsidy. Lecavalier will become a millstone around the neck of the franchise. This will require a fire sale or outright release to achieve cap relief. 

However, Tampa's problems are not unique. All teams will have the similar challenge. I believe there are very few teams in a position to absorb Lecavalier, and those that are, are unlikely to strip mine their talent pool to complete this transaction. 

I see Lecavalier being traded for a top player and either a first round or prospect, at best. Teams are beginning to place a premium on youth, prospects and draft choices as a means of low cost certainty.
Trading for Lecavalier would not only contradict this movement, but would financially handcuff for years, any team that trades for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any GM that would give up that much for Lecavalier should be fired. </p>
<p>Tampa is a mess financially and therefore is not dealing from a position of strength.</p>
<p>As the salary cap shrinks and the NHL approaches financial Armaggeddon, Tampa will have less money to fill their roster. Hell they can&#8217;t meet payroll without the NHL&#8217;s small market subsidy. Lecavalier will become a millstone around the neck of the franchise. This will require a fire sale or outright release to achieve cap relief. </p>
<p>However, Tampa&#8217;s problems are not unique. All teams will have the similar challenge. I believe there are very few teams in a position to absorb Lecavalier, and those that are, are unlikely to strip mine their talent pool to complete this transaction. </p>
<p>I see Lecavalier being traded for a top player and either a first round or prospect, at best. Teams are beginning to place a premium on youth, prospects and draft choices as a means of low cost certainty.<br />
Trading for Lecavalier would not only contradict this movement, but would financially handcuff for years, any team that trades for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Improvement, but still a flawed team by Mike</title>
		<link>http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/2009/03/29/improvement-but-still-a-flawed-team/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=43#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>My name is Mike and I run http://www.NHLsnipers.com.  I am just curious if you would like to swap links.

Let me know in a quick comment on my site or email me: nhlsnipers at gmail.

If so, send me the link you want listed.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My name is Mike and I run <a href="http://www.NHLsnipers.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.NHLsnipers.com</a>.  I am just curious if you would like to swap links.</p>
<p>Let me know in a quick comment on my site or email me: nhlsnipers at gmail.</p>
<p>If so, send me the link you want listed.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Annus horribilis by wright</title>
		<link>http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/2009/03/21/annus-horribilis/#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=41#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>Scotty, this team needs to reinvent itself. The Koivu/Kovalev era unfortunately has not pushed the team to the promised land. The Habs gm will have cap space, and some solid assets in the minors to make a substantial trade, to address the need for a ppg producer on offense. Can the entire wish list be addressed in one season, probably not, but even if there are low level trades for secondary players, the team needs a makeover. The present edition lacks passion, constant work ethic, and mental toughness.

The existing core simply has not gotten it done. Changes are required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scotty, this team needs to reinvent itself. The Koivu/Kovalev era unfortunately has not pushed the team to the promised land. The Habs gm will have cap space, and some solid assets in the minors to make a substantial trade, to address the need for a ppg producer on offense. Can the entire wish list be addressed in one season, probably not, but even if there are low level trades for secondary players, the team needs a makeover. The present edition lacks passion, constant work ethic, and mental toughness.</p>
<p>The existing core simply has not gotten it done. Changes are required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Annus horribilis by wright</title>
		<link>http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/2009/03/21/annus-horribilis/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=41#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>Steve, I think one of the biggest fundamental differences between the Leafs and the Habs....coaching. Ron Wilson is a superb coach. There is a structure to the Leafs game, and the work ethic is very high. Wilson has gotten everything out of the talent level he has been assigned.

The Habs still have a fairly deep talent pool in the minors, and a tremendous amount of cap space come the end of the season. Gainey (if he remains the gm) or whomever is the next gm will need to capitalize on those assets and address the short comings of the team. The Habs gm is going to have to root out the various players that made horrendous off ice decisions that in part have contributed to the teams freefall.

With Burke as Toronto's gm, and the moves he and Fletcher made to stock pile draft picks, it should be an interesting off season, for both Leafs and the Habs. Regards, Randall Wright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I think one of the biggest fundamental differences between the Leafs and the Habs&#8230;.coaching. Ron Wilson is a superb coach. There is a structure to the Leafs game, and the work ethic is very high. Wilson has gotten everything out of the talent level he has been assigned.</p>
<p>The Habs still have a fairly deep talent pool in the minors, and a tremendous amount of cap space come the end of the season. Gainey (if he remains the gm) or whomever is the next gm will need to capitalize on those assets and address the short comings of the team. The Habs gm is going to have to root out the various players that made horrendous off ice decisions that in part have contributed to the teams freefall.</p>
<p>With Burke as Toronto&#8217;s gm, and the moves he and Fletcher made to stock pile draft picks, it should be an interesting off season, for both Leafs and the Habs. Regards, Randall Wright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Annus horribilis by Steve</title>
		<link>http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/2009/03/21/annus-horribilis/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canadiens.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=41#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>I might be coming from left field with this one, but I actually think the Leafs are a step ahead of the Habs on the things you just listed.

They're heading in the direction you outline, and they've done more to address those needs in the long term than Montreal has.

Both teams need size and physical presence to add to their speedy core.  The Leafs have a greater defensive intensity... they've just lacked the goaltending.  Their shot totals are more in line with what one would like to see, and they pressure in all 3 zones.  They have a level of leadership that doesn't always back down, and as such are in most games even when they should be out of them.

Lastly they need some level of star power, but that should come through drafting and development, or perhaps free agency.  It will be interesting to see which of these two teams makes it back to the promised land first.  I was assuming it would be Montreal, but now it looks like they're neck and neck for the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might be coming from left field with this one, but I actually think the Leafs are a step ahead of the Habs on the things you just listed.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re heading in the direction you outline, and they&#8217;ve done more to address those needs in the long term than Montreal has.</p>
<p>Both teams need size and physical presence to add to their speedy core.  The Leafs have a greater defensive intensity&#8230; they&#8217;ve just lacked the goaltending.  Their shot totals are more in line with what one would like to see, and they pressure in all 3 zones.  They have a level of leadership that doesn&#8217;t always back down, and as such are in most games even when they should be out of them.</p>
<p>Lastly they need some level of star power, but that should come through drafting and development, or perhaps free agency.  It will be interesting to see which of these two teams makes it back to the promised land first.  I was assuming it would be Montreal, but now it looks like they&#8217;re neck and neck for the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
